Go With The Glow? Shining is more than sportsmen and heroes

In this blog I have been commenting on the book ALL THINGS SHINING by Dreyfus and Kelly. I like its pluralism and immanence and polytheism of moods, but I think it has a one-sided view of intensities or what they call « shining », that excludes the “pathological” intensities. All this talk of « shining » (really as pluralists they should say « shinings ») is somehow limited to best case scenarios, when shining is not a normative notion. One could compare this with Deleuze and Guattari’s cry in ANTI-OEDIPUS:

« Everything must be interpreted in intensity » (p173)

For D&G this is already what Nietzsche and Artaud were doing.   So I was glad to come across this post using Artaud, and to this one using Nietzsche.

Cet article, publié dans All Things Shining - the book, Dreyfus, Kelly, Uncategorized, est tagué , , . Ajoutez ce permalien à vos favoris.

Votre commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s