Archives mensuelles : novembre 2013

HARMAN’S « MASTER ARGUMENT » AGAINST RELATIONAL ONTOLOGIES

Harman’s “master argument” against relational ontologies is that they cannot explain change, that if everything were related nothing would change. This is patently false, as relations include temporal relations. Deleuze for example talks about both kinetic (relative speeds and accelerations) … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | 2 commentaires

HARMAN’S MAGICAL REALISM: how abstract monist relativist anti-realism masquerades as its opposite

Today, OOO is at a loss. Its hackneyed set of critical terms (philosophy of access, shams and simulacra, lavalampy overmining, atomistic undermining) clearly have no point of application at all to the new lines of research opened up by Bruno … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | Laisser un commentaire

TRUST vs PROT: modes and countermodes in the pluriverse

In the introduction to  AN INQUIRY INTO MODES OF EXISTENCE Latour recounts being shocked by the sceptical question of an industrialist to a climate scientist, and being surprised at the lack of appeal to the certainty of expert knowledge in … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | 2 commentaires

Deleuze, Klossowski, and Hillman on psychic multiplicity

Latour attempts to give us a phenomenology of the original experience of emotion that underlies the mode of existence of invisible psychogenic beings, or « divinities ». He declares that with the emotion and the impression that it comes from outside there … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | 8 commentaires

LATOUR, DRACULA, ET LE MANIFESTE CENTAURE

Dans »Dracula et l’ontologie » Randolph Carter pose la question du mode d’être en apparence paradoxal des êtres fantastiques tels que Dracula. Il part d’une formule proposée par Denis Mellier pour caractériser la fiction fantastique: « le fantastique ne peut jamais être ce … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | Laisser un commentaire

REBLOG: Dracula et l’ontologie

Some people have had problems accessing this post by Randolph Carter on his interesting blog Ligne de fuite. So I have decided to reblog it here: « Denis  Mellier, spécialiste de la littérature fantastique, énonce dans sa thèse L’écriture de l’excès, … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | 1 commentaire

BRUNO LATOUR’S ONTOLOGICAL ASCENT AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL DESCENT

Latour’s movement is initially phenomenological. He attempts to get away from the abstraction of the subject-object division and to come back to both historical and individual experience. Only then can he rise to more “cosmological” concerns. In the case of … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | 1 commentaire

Chapter 7: Reinstituting the Beings of Metamorphosis

Initialement publié sur AIME Research Group :
Author: Terence Blake The movement of deconstruction of the split between subject and object allied to the pluralisation of ontologies continues. We must now apply this ontological pluralism to the irrational superstitions that are…

Publié dans Uncategorized | 7 commentaires

NON-THEISTIC GRATITUDE: On William Connolly, ALL THINGS SHINING, and PULP FICTION

Note six years later (August 24, 2019): Sean Kelly, co-author with Hubert Dreyfus of ALL THINGS SHINING, has published a thoughtful post on the relation between decision and gratitude, in partial dialogue with this post (which figures as a section … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | Tagué | 3 commentaires

GRACE, SHINING, AND INDIVIDUATION: Adam Miller, Hubert Dreyfus, and Sean Kelly on David Foster Wallace

Two years ago Adam S.Miller, the author of SPECULATIVE GRACE: Bruno Latour and Object-Oriented Theology, published a text criticising Hubert Dreyfus and Sean Kelly’s ALL THINGS SHINING for its misunderstanding of David Foster Wallace, whom they accuse of nihilism. Miller … Lire la suite

Publié dans Uncategorized | 2 commentaires