Despite the effort of some scientistic throwbacks (as Latour exclaims ironically: « Where have they been ») to just define pluralism over the protestations of those who have gone some way along that track, some blog posts have tried to give an account of how things look from an actual pluralist perspective. It is a desolating experience to see the scientistic rationalists up to their old tactics of « We’ll define your position for you, now stop protesting and defend the position as we define it against our objections ».
A few posts:
Footnotes 2 Plato on « Life in the Pluriverse: Towards a Realistic Pluralism »
Circling Squares on « Reply to Levi on pluralism, etc. »
Knowledge Ecology on « Three Types of Pluralism »