but… I’m not a materialist

I accuse Harman of ideological regression, but not of materialism: https://www.academia.edu/7211852/HARMAN_AND_PARMENIDES_OOOs_Abandon_of_Speculation_about_the_Real

Object-Oriented Philosophy

Someone sent me THIS RECORDING of Žižek’s recent lecture at Birkbeck, in which Jane Bennett and I are described as new materialists.

I love Žižek, but that isn’t very precise on his part. Bennett is a materialist, and I am not. I am neither a “new” materialist nor an “old” one.

It continually puzzles me when people assume that “object-oriented” means “materialist.” It doesn’t. I think the reason that people like Žižek always say this is because, to them, all philosophies that do not put the human subject at the center of the action look alike.

Žižek can accuse others of “ideological regression” all he likes, but he’s the one who’s stuck with an 1810-era dismissal of realism, not me.

But I’ll have a book on Žižek and Badiou coming out fairly soon, and will resume the debate there. Those two are unquestionably the two dominant living figures in continental philosophy, and they deserve a serious response…

View original post 12 more words

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s