WHAT ORDER SHOULD AIME BE WRITTEN IN?

I think it is good to begin with double-click, [DC], as this idea of transport of information without transformation contaminates our presuppositions about potentially every other mode. Suspending [DC] is related to the phenomenological reduction, of beginning by suspending the natural attitude. The order in the book is already a pedagogical order. The order of discovery, as explained by Latour in BIOGRAPHY OF AN INQUIRY and COMING OUT AS A PHILOSOPHER, begins with the mode specific to religion [REL]. Beginning with [REL] would have the advantage of clarity but I think the analysis of religion is flawed and contestable. However, beginning with [REL] also has the advantage of starting with a mode where it is easier for many moderns to see the distortion that [DC] brings about, the « belief in belief ». The transfer of this result to the next mode in Latour’s order of discovery, science or [REF] would be facilitated. Other orders could be adopted for particular audiences.

Cet article a été publié dans Uncategorized. Ajoutez ce permalien à vos favoris.

2 commentaires pour WHAT ORDER SHOULD AIME BE WRITTEN IN?

  1. Yannick Rumpala dit :

    Have you seen this?
    « A text that invents a strategically naïve anthropologist to find out what is might also indulge in the strategic naivety of the utopian to find out what it means to want something else ».
    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23269995.2014.933055#.U9OxgrEudFs

    Aimé par 1 personne

Votre commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Google

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Google. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s