When Deleuze theorises the kind of “one-sided dialogue” that Feyerabend talks about, he tells us that creation stems from a solitude that is richly populated because each of us “is many”, that is his depression talking just as much as his joy, and there is no way to for us to separate them any more than he did. Deleuze was very wily and would reject depression in the name of Spinozan joy and of Nietzschean affirmation. But he would then go on to talk about solitude, ascesis, becoming secret, striking a blow against stupidity, seeing the intolerable, the shame of being a man, being schizo, and deterritorialisation, and still people would think his pluralism was a big party!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s