LARUELLE AGAINST LACANIAN REDUCTIONISM

Laruelle has trouble freeing himself from the Lacanian and Althusserian vocabulary of his formative years, which perhaps explains his obsessive focus on “science” as a way out of that marasm. This has led to a Lacanian reading where Laruelle theorises a closure within philosophical worlds so absolute that the only contact with the “Real” can only be trauma. This hermetic separation between the diverse worlds, and between a particular world and the real, is totally rejected and rebutted by Laruelle’s appropriation of quantum thinking.

Here Bruno Latour, with his mode of existence of metamorphic beings, is more “non-philosophical” than much of Laruelle.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to LARUELLE AGAINST LACANIAN REDUCTIONISM

  1. 3ph says:

    Where is this Lacanian reading of trauma to be found in Laruelle? Anything translated?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s