Andrew Cole’s very interesting critique of Graham Harman’s OOO can be found here. Harman gave a very unsatisfactory reply, pretending that his reply to Alexander Galloway had covered the more substantial points. His reply begins by mocking a quip by Cole about Kant’s empirically lacunary sex life as undermining his discussion of the categorical imperative, which explains the title of my response. Harman’s reply can be found here (you have to register to read it, but registration is free).



This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s