“Uni-laterality” properly belongs to Laruelle’s non-philosophy phase, and it is a mistake for him to continue it into his non-standard philosophy phase. It should be rejected as a dogmatic principle, but it can be maintained as one possible heuristic guiding principle for some local analyses (although this is not my choice).

Recently, some of Laruelle’s followers have been describing his position as “empirical” (I do not think this is so). If this is the case then uni-laterality cannot be a dogma, but only a regional empirical hypothesis.

For more details see my article LARUELLE’S QUANTUM HERMENEUTICS.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s