I agree with Artxell Knaphni that the words « immanence » and « transcendence » belong to a conceptual metaphorics. Deleuze’s own use of « immanence » is in danger of being self-contradictory, as the intended anti-foundational meaning of the word can be negated by its use as part of some foundational litany.
The reiterated use of a « non-theological » vocabulary is often itself a theological gesture. Repeating it three times (or horror! more) does not make it so. A « Deleuzian » veneer can hide positivist fabric.
On the analogy of the famous « Latour litany » we could call such lexical tropes « Deleuze dithyrambs ».