ZIZEK AND THE QUANTUM MODEL: Explanatory Distance vs Formal Closeness

I think that the « mirroring » (what Zizek calls the « uncanny resemblance ») between the quantum level and that of human subjectivity is more than a simple formal homology and less than an ontological grounding. As a working hypothesis I call this mirroring a type of « formal causality ».

Johnston’s argument is that Zizek’s use of quantum mechanics to explain the emergence of free subjectivity starts at a level that is too far from the phenomenon that it is trying to explain and would require a long series of “bridge” theories before getting to the level of the human subject. It would thus be more economical to begin with biology and brain science, which occupy levels just adjacent to the human subject and which (similarly to quantum physics) premise an ontological incompleteness of nature.

Johnston’s objection depends on what I call “the argument from distance”, which itself depends on the standard view of science as edified on the stratification of the levels of emergence (or of reduction, depending on which direction you take, moving up or down the levels). This is what has been called the “layer cake” model of explanation and reduction.

Zizek’s idea is that on the layer cake model the quantum level appears “distant” from the human level, with many other intervening levels, but that from a formal view they are quite close. This means that for him the layer cake model is not always the best or most useful way to envisage the relation between different ontic domains.

Zizek gives primacy to the quantum model not because it is the most fundamental level following the the descending line of reductions and of efficient causality, but because it is the most “deconstructed” model, and thus formally closer to human subjectivity. The sort of causality that Zizek is emphasising here is a formal causality, where the “highest” (or most distant) abstractions are inscribed in the real itself. In other words, Zizek is arguing for a realist interpretation of quantum concepts.

This formal analogy between quantum physics and subjectivity means that the formal causality is operative not only at the “base” or sub-microscopic level but equally at every succeeding level. Real emergence from one level to another, that cannot be explained by reduction to lower levels, is only possible because of the ontological incompleteness that is best described by quantum mechanics (at the present moment, for Zizek this notion of the « best » scientific description is an empirical question).

Note: I am indebted to a discussion with Cadell Last for helping me to clarify my ideas on this question.

Cet article a été publié dans Uncategorized. Ajoutez ce permalien à vos favoris.

3 commentaires pour ZIZEK AND THE QUANTUM MODEL: Explanatory Distance vs Formal Closeness

  1. dmf dit :

    seems like the ongoing gap (quantum/classical) in physics is a real issue here so I’m with Johnston/Malibou, on my to do list is watching

    J'aime

  2. dmf dit :

    I guess he is still caught up in this view, it isn’t the cake that’s at issue it’s the real logical chasm/opposition between the physics models/worlds to just gloss over that while still cashing in on the authority of the science is shifty, reminds me of Barad and the unfortunate Baradians, too bad people don’t like Pickering more but I guess he doesn’t offer the same kind of gravitas.

    J'aime

Votre commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Google

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Google. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s