It has slowly become apparent that François Laruelle’s non-philosophy as applied by his Anglophone acolytes is a machine of misreading, a technique of getting things wrong.
Laruelle’s obscurantist syntax and lexics does not hide any meta-sophistication over and above its targets but an overgrown and overblown sub-philosophy.
All talk of « de-growth » given this problem of semantic bloat is laughable. Applied to other philosophers’ texts de-growth equals de-reading, leaving out all that does not correspond to the over-simplified picture that is elaborated out of this ignorantist methodology.
You have such creative terms. I forget the other one a while ago, but ‘semantic bloat’. Fabulous.
J'aimeJ'aime