LARUELLE AND DELEUZE: from difference to multiplicity

Laruelle ‘s critique of the system of difference as found in the work of Heidegger, Derrida, Foucault and Deleuze repeats belatedly Deleuze’s own self-criticism of his pre-Guattari phase as being still entangled in the domain of representation. More generally, Laruelle, despite his considerable merits, is systematically wrong when he assigns Deleuze to the realm of philosophical sufficiency ( “representation”, in Deleuze’s terms). Despite his deep and intense non-philosophical voyage, Laruelle is incapable of reading Deleuze and Guattari’s works, up to and including their WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?, in terms of their relation with the non-philosophical outside, because he has not measured what the collaboration of Deleuze and Guattari brought to both of them.

Full paper here.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to LARUELLE AND DELEUZE: from difference to multiplicity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s