Laruelle ‘s critique of the system of difference as found in the work of Heidegger, Derrida, Foucault and Deleuze repeats belatedly Deleuze’s own self-criticism of his pre-Guattari phase as being still entangled in the domain of representation. More generally, Laruelle, despite his considerable merits, is systematically wrong when he assigns Deleuze to the realm of philosophical sufficiency ( “representation”, in Deleuze’s terms). Despite his deep and intense non-philosophical voyage, Laruelle is incapable of reading Deleuze and Guattari’s works, up to and including their WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?, in terms of their relation with the non-philosophical outside, because he has not measured what the collaboration of Deleuze and Guattari brought to both of them.
Full paper here.
AGENT SWARM 
hopefully this will end up @ backdoor broadcasting:
http://www.kingston.ac.uk/events/item/1252/28-may-2015-seminar-badiou-and-deleuze/
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
Ping : Extra fun Laruelle reading – Lincoln Philosophy Forum
When I initially commented I seem to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on every time a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the same comment. Perhaps there is a way you can remove me from that service? Thanks a lot!
J’aimeJ’aime
I can’t find you in my list of followers, perhaps you used another name or email account? I can’t find any other comment, under what post did you comment?
J’aimeJ’aime