FROM OCCUPY TO MULTIPLY: speculative realism is noone’s property

Leon Niemoczynski, a speculative realist philosopher in his own right (and a frequent contributor of comments to this blog) has posted a list of 5 rising « hip philosophers », and was kind enough to include me on the list. Leon  is himself a « top hip » philosopher and will soon be publishing his own speculative realist book: « Speculative Naturalism: Speculative Realism as an Ecological Metaphysics« . Thus pluralism has finally come to speculative realism at the level of including names that were not in the « foundational event » at Goldsmiths College in 2007. As Michel Serres has taught us founding means doing violence to a multiple real, scapegoating and excluding what it cannot dominate.

On this blog I have argued

1) Feyerabend was a speculative realist philosopher decades before the founding of the movement.

2) Michel Onfray has been elaborating a very interesting speculative realist philosophy for the last 25 years, far from the slogans of the « new » realism.

3) Graham Harman is not a speculative realist, but an intuitive idealist.

So one can be a speculative realist without being a « Speculative Realist ». Feyerabend is an example, but so are Deleuze, Lyotard, Serres, Whitehead, Viveiros de Castro, Wolfendale, Niemoczynski, Johnston, Caputo, and many others. Conversely, one can be a « Speculative Realist » without being a speculative realist, as Graham Harman’s strange and awkward stipulative idealism shows.

Cet article a été publié dans Uncategorized. Ajoutez ce permalien à vos favoris.

3 commentaires pour FROM OCCUPY TO MULTIPLY: speculative realism is noone’s property

  1. I have a hard time accepting Feyerabend as a realist! He comes the closest to Wheeler’s It From Bit where Feyerabend says that the different epistemic modalities qua different lifeways elluct interrogate incompatible responses from Nature as a kind of impredicative-in-itself which is not given in advance prior to being effectuated through a life way. I characterize this as an Irrealism (rather than an antirealism).

    J'aime

    • terenceblake dit :

      Feyerabend was a realist from the very beginning to the end of his work. At the end he hesitated a lot on the proper terminology to describe his philosophy, most often describing it as epistemological relativism allied to ontological realism.

      J'aime

Votre commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Google

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Google. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s